When Does Serena Williams Play Again at the Us Open
Carlos Ramos, Umpire Known for Rigidity, Lands in U.South. Open Firestorm
The chair umpire whom Serena Williams called a "thief" in the women's singles final at the United states of america Open on Sat has long been willing to enforce the rules past the book with the game'due south biggest stars, male person and female.
The umpire, Carlos Ramos, a 47-year-quondam from Portugal, was at the eye of controversy in the match, drawing Williams's ire in the second set of her 6-2, 6-iv loss to Naomi Osaka.
Ramos gave Williams three code-of-behave violations — for illegal coaching, abusing a racket and verbally abusing an official, the last of which resulted in Osaka being awarded a game late in the 2nd ready.
After the friction match, Williams was fined $17,000: $10,000 for verbal abuse, the largest fine of the U.S. Open so far; $4,000 for the coaching violation, and $iii,000 for racket corruption. According to the rule volume, players are subject to fines upwardly to $20,000 for each of those offenses.
Though Ramos is considered a strict umpire, critics say he could have washed more than to defuse the situation on Saturday before calling Williams for two of her three code violations.
"Both made mistakes," said Pam Shriver, the former player who is now an ESPN analyst. "Ramos helped derail a championship match past being rigid beyond normal protocol by not giving starting time a soft warning for coaching, not communicating finer to defuse an emotional player and by not allowing a player to allow off more steam earlier giving the 3rd code violation that gave a game at a crucial time in a final.
"No four-letter words were used that I heard."
On the outset, in which Ramos spotted Williams's coach Patrick Mouratoglou giving a articulate signal early on in the 2nd fix, he could have given Williams what is known as a soft warning, informing her that he had spotted Mouratoglou coaching and that it needed to stop.
Instead, Ramos opted to sanction her directly.
The 2nd code violation came after Williams smashed her racket subsequently losing her serve in the fifth game of the 2d gear up. That was an automatic racket abuse violation, and information technology cost Williams a signal as her 2d code violation.
But Ramos could have taken a more than active approach before giving Williams her tertiary lawmaking violation, for verbal abuse, past reminding her of the gamble she was running if she continued to mutter and to get personal. Williams patently believed, mistakenly, that he had rescinded his alarm for coaching after her protests. Code violations, nevertheless, cannot be rescinded by a chair umpire during a lucifer.
Ramos is one of the most experienced lucifer officials in tennis. He has completed the chair umpire version of so-called Golden Slam, a term referring to a thespian's winning all four of the major titles along with an Olympic gilded medal. He is the only active chair umpire to have officiated the men'due south singles finals at all 4 of the Thou Slam tournaments, and he besides presided over the 2012 men'south Olympic singles final between Andy Murray and Roger Federer.
While there was much criticism of Ramos on social media later on the match, and several top players have been less than appreciative of his calls, some in the world of officials defended him.
"Carlos has been one of the top tennis umpires in the world since the mid-1990s and has a reputation for being firm only fair in his handling of the players," said Mike Morrissey, a quondam top chair umpire and the former head of officiating for the International Tennis Federation.
Katrina Adams, the president of the The states Tennis Association, defended Williams in an interview with ESPN on Sun.
"I would say last night is unfortunate," she said. "We have to have consistency, considering when you wait at what the women, in this example Serena, is feeling, we watch the guys exercise this all the time. They are badgering the chair umpires on the changeover. Nothing happens."
It is highly unusual for a federation president, especially i in charge of a 1000 Slam tournament, to directly criticize a lucifer official. Her comments on Sunday came subsequently she unilaterally released a statement on Saturday commending Williams'south support of Osaka at the awards anniversary while ignoring the tumultuous moments that preceded it.
Adams indicated to ESPN that there would be "conversations" about gender equality and officiating "in the next week." She suggested that there should have been more dialogue between Ramos and Williams before the final violation for verbal abuse was chosen.
In a statement Dominicus dark, Steve Simon, the primary executive of the WTA, criticized Ramos's officiating: "The WTA believes there should exist no difference in the standards of tolerance provided to the emotions expressed past men vs. women and is committed to working with the sport to ensure that all players are treated the same. Nosotros do not believe that this was done last dark."
Other players, including Murray, Venus Williams, Novak Djokovic, Rafael Nadal and Nick Kyrgios, have complained on court after receiving code violations from Ramos.
At the 2022 French Open, Venus Williams disputed an illegal coaching call, saying, "I'm 36 years old. Never in my life accept I had a coaching violation. No, I don't do that."
At the 2022 French Open up, during a quaternary-round match betwixt Nadal and Roberto Batista Agut, Ramos penalized Nadal for two time violations for irksome play, the second of which cost Nadal a point.
"There are umpires who sometimes put more than pressure than others, and you lot have to accept this," Nadal said after that lucifer, which he won.
Nadal added: "I'yard telling you this with some type of sadness, because I don't want to have any problems. But this umpire is, I think, trying in a certain way to wait for my faults, my errors. This is the impression I have."
In the aforementioned interview, Nadal said of Ramos, "I respect him a lot."
Active chair umpires are more often than not not permitted to requite interviews because of bout policies. Ramos has not spoken publicly about Saturday's match, in which Williams called him "a thief" for assessing the violations and also accused him of sexism, proverb he had dealt with her more harshly than he would take a male thespian in the same circumstances.
"I've seen other men call other umpires several things," she said after the match. "I'm here fighting for women'due south rights and for women'south equality and for all kinds of stuff. For me to say 'thief' and for him to take a game, it made me feel like it was a sexist remark. He'south never taken a game from a human being considering they said 'thief.'"
Merely he has not been hesitant to penalize men. Ramos gave Murray a code violation during the 2022 Olympics after Murray accused him of "stupid umpiring."
"No sexist issue there," said Chris Evert, the former world No. 1, on Sunday. "His history with men players shows that."
Although Ramos has officiated more than men's matches during his career, he too has now officiated at iii of the iv women'southward G Slam singles finals: the French Open in 2005, Wimbledon in 2008 and now this year's United States Open, where he too officiated in women's semifinal matches in 2022 and 2016. (Williams played in 4 of those matches.)
On Sabbatum, Mouratoglou admitted that he had been giving signals to Williams, although she said she did non meet them. Mouratoglou also said that the electric current rule banning coaching during Grand Slam tournaments (it is allowed in WTA Bout events) was a gateway to "hypocrisy" because coaching was so widespread despite the dominion. In its statement Sunday, the WTA said coaching should exist allowed across the sport.
But privately and publicly, tennis officials — by and present — defended Ramos on Sunday. Morrissey said Mouratoglou'southward coaching was so breathy it deserved to be sanctioned immediately.
Morrissey said he did non think that articulate coaching could be handled with a soft alert. "It'due south so rare to exist able to exist certain of it that the soft arroyo needs to exist reserved for the bulk of cases when it's not clear," he said.
Richard Ings, some other quondam chair umpire from Australia, said Mouratoglou signaled twice "to ensure Serena saw information technology."
"No fashion Carlos could have let that slide," Ings said. "He had to cease it, and finish it he did. I thought Carlos was brilliant, courageous and calm."
As for the exact abuse, Morrissey said Ramos was restrained, non rash.
"I don't know what was said by Carlos, only I don't call up I would have plant a good fashion to remind her about the potential game penalty without throwing fuel on the fire," Morrissey said. "Possibly at that place was a mode, but given her mood, not easy or likely at all."
He added that "the 'thief' accusation is not i any chair umpire on any court should ignore."
The allegation was fabricated later Williams already had expressed her discontent at length. The Grand Slam dominion book defines verbal abuse equally a statement virtually an official that "implies dishonesty or is derogatory, insulting or otherwise abusive."
Williams herself said she had not had negative experiences when Ramos had worked her matches in the past.
"Non at all," she said Saturday. "He's always been a swell umpire."
Merely she told Ramos on courtroom in the heat of the moment that he would "never" officiate i of her matches in the future. Players practise non have the power to make those decisions, although tour supervisors have in the past discreetly kept chair umpires from working the matches of players with whom they accept had altercations. But those breaks — known as "vacations" — are not permanent breaks.
So Ramos and Williams, who has said this latest improvement is only showtime, could very well run across once again.
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/09/sports/tennis/serena-williams-umpire-carlos-ramos-us-open.html
Postar um comentário for "When Does Serena Williams Play Again at the Us Open"